Posted on

A Rumination on the Longevity of Story vs. The Life of the Ego

All right, so instead of finishing writing the story I need to write this month, I’m thinking and spending way too much fucking time inside my head. Solipsism and lack of contact/interaction with my favorite people in the world (aside from my better half) has been the cause, I’m quite certain. So now I’m going to write a blog-post about something that has been whizzing all around the chambers of my head since I sat down on the toilet at work earlier tonight (I know, a little less glamorous place than a bathtub for a “eureka” moment, but it’ll do).

Earlier tonight, I felt the old call of nature and had to take a bathroom break. I elected to take the stall, as it was a way to cheat the clock and spend a few minutes off my feet. Once on the throne, I looked to my right and saw a graffitied conversation/message board commensurate with the sophistication of an elementary philosophy class. The first message that started it off was something like this: “This message is here to say something. But it will be erased and will vanish forever. Nothing is permanent. Remember that.” Sensible enough, if not an obvious statement to make. It’s nice to be reminded of these things every now and then. However, the next message went something like, “Yeah, but now even if it gets erased, it has entered our minds and lives on forever.” Insert snide comment here. The next comment was the one that got me thinking: “No, it doesn’t. You die, idiot.”

That was the end of the conversation as I found it. And how interesting that the first thought that rose to my head happened to be, “That’s why storytelling is so important!” I sat there for a while, wondering if I should pull the pen out of my pocket (not a euphemism) and write my retort right there under the “my dad is bigger than your dad” comment.I will save face by not answering the obvious implied question and instead forge on to elaborate on my first knee jerk thought.

What the last poster said was true. We die. Things break down. The center cannot hold. Turning and turning in the widening gyre and all that noise. So how do we ensure that something lasts forever? How do we extend the longevity of us? The answer to the question may seem obvious, given what has been said before. And it is. But that’s not the important part. Lots of people, when asked why they write, say “Because this way I can live forever.” The folly in this statement is the main importance, the integral piece to this post.

In the interest of full disclosure, when I first started out writing, this was my reason for writing. I knew that books were published and many of those people who wrote those books have been talked about year after year and were never forgotten. I admired and worshiped (and still do) those writers. In our culture and in our profession of writing, the writer has become elevated to a level above what is most important. The thing that is most important is the story and the craft. And it is in this answer to the question of why we write that we see the vanity of the writer being repeated constantly. Which is not to say that the writer is the only one who has these moments. Lots of parents have this same answer (whether they admit it or not) to the question of why they became parents. The problem is when we dedicate ourselves to this craft, this noble pursuit in the attempt to live forever, essentially admitting to our using this great gift of storytelling as a means to an end. Telling the story should be the end, not its means. Why is this? Because we don’t live forever. No one lives forever. But the story does.

Let’s face it. We don’t tell stories to make ourselves live forever. C.S. Lewis said that we write not to be understood, but to understand. This is a good place to start. We wish to generate compassion in ourselves through the means of creating, exploring, inquiring, and finally creating. However, at the same time, F. Scott Fitzgerald once said, “Writers don’t write because they want to say something. They write because they have something to say.” Here Fitzgerald is alluding to the idea that instead of trying to generate compassion in ourselves, we are trying to generate compassion in others. Projecting rather than internalizing.  I think right here is the crux, the dichotomy in the view of craft. These aren’t quite two different sides to the same coin, but they do somewhat create the yin-yang of the storytelling world. We write to create and to communicate. We tell stories for this same reason. The oral tradition and the written tradition were both used to communicate and and entertain. And to this end, our stories convey the values that are held by us and that we hope to pass down. These themes and ideas are all intertwined in the process of storytelling. And finally, I’ll get to my point.

I think an important thing to strive for in your own writing is the ego-death of the author. You may have heard this term before and you may not have. Normally, it’s used to describe the feeling that comes over you during an LSD experience where you achieve objectivity. You cease to be yourself. You see yourself from a god’s eye view and selfishness becomes a foreign term. I’m candy-coating it slightly. According to those people I know who have experienced it, it’s actually quite fucking terrifying. It was fucking terrifying to me when I heard about it. But the point still stands that we as authors (and the best ones have) need to take ourselves out of the equation when creating our characters, settings, et cetera. Or at least the part of ourselves where the ego resides; where I wonder, agonize, and fret over just how I’m going to come off to those who will read this piece of my soul I’m putting down right now. And I know this sounds high and mighty, and holier than thou and all that shit. Because believe me, it sounds like that to me, too. And some who read this won’t like the suggestion that I’ve put forth. I know I’ve heard this suggestion in quite a different places lately, and I didn’t like it any of the times I heard it. In fact, it scared me quite a bit. And why wouldn’t it? The ego doesn’t like to hear that it should be put to sleep every once in a while, especially when the piece of my soul is being put down in a format where other egos will superimpose themselves in judgment over this piece of my heart. As Faulkner once said, “What matters is not the writer. What matters is the story. If I hadn’t been born, I would have been written anyway.” Though I’m not sure I agree with this assessment, it’s true that we don’t know who wrote Beowfulf or The Epic of Gilgamesh or who exactly wrote those amazing pieces of The Bible and maybe that’s what we need. These scribes didn’t think it necessary to add their own stamps to these pieces of art. The story was enough and would live on far longer than they themselves. Now, I’m not suggesting we go so far as to take our names off our own works. But I am suggesting that we remember that we serve our characters and we serve our stories. Not the other way around.

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s